University of Phoenix support.

It sits on the transcript by itself, with nothing beside it to offset the average. That is the trade-off for taking one course at a time: the workload is humane and all the risk is concentrated. It is also why running the arithmetic on a struggling block in week two rather than week four matters so much.

More than it looks. Courses typically name a number of separate days you must post on and define what counts as substantive, and those rows are scored on the pattern your posting history shows rather than on what you said. Nothing about it tests ability, which makes it the cheapest full marks in the program and, for the same reason, the ones most often handed back.

Frequently, and it turns on one thing: whether your program replaces the original result or averages the two. Where it replaces, a retake can be worth considerably more to your average than a rescued pass, and the block you are currently fighting stops mattering. Where it averages, the reverse holds and the fight is worth having. Confirm which applies before deciding, because it reverses the answer entirely and almost nobody checks it in time.

Then the protection you needed was in place three weeks earlier: your section written, in the shared space, under your name. That way a collapse costs you extra work rather than marks. Tell the instructor before the deadline rather than after, because before is information and after is a complaint.

Usually yes in calendar terms, and often not in practice, because the completion rate is what actually determines when you finish. Four courses attempted badly can produce fewer credits at the end of a year than one course at a time done properly, and they produce a worse transcript while doing it. For people whose working weeks are unpredictable, the slower route is frequently the faster one, and it is far less likely to end in a repeat.